NJSBA Daily Briefing: 10/22/2026

NJSBA Daily Briefing
This is the web archive of the New Jersey State Bar Association’s Daily Briefing email, sent to members on the morning of Thursday, October 22, 2026.
 
 
New Jersey State Bar Association

The Daily Briefing is an exclusive New Jersey State Bar Association member benefit

 

 

October 22, 2026

 

 
On-Demand Weekend Catch-Up
 
 

Legal News

 

The October issue of explores the challenges and opportunities facing new attorneys, with insights on judicial clerkships, solo practice, professional networking and career development. The issue also offers practical tips on legal writing, productivity and practice management to help attorneys succeed at every stage of their careers. Access the digital edition .

 

New Jersey is still trapping families in special education court battles “well beyond” the legal time limit, according to a new judicial report, leaving scores of disabled children without timely services. Read the NJ Spotlight News article .

 

Join Brad Wetherall, COO of Esquire Digital, and special guest Jeff Zenna, Managing Partner of Blume Forte Fried Zerres & Molinari, for a practical discussion on Oct. 27 about how today's most successful law firms are adapting to the rapidly changing client acquisition landscape. Attendees will learn how artificial intelligence, Google, online reputation, digital authority and evolving consumer behavior are changing the way prospective clients find and choose legal representation. This is the first in a year-long series of free webinars for NJSBA members. Register .

 

The New Jersey Supreme Court appointed Superior Court Judge Gwendolyn Blue to lead the Camden Vicinage. Blue will succeed Judge Steven Polansky, who is retiring after more than 14 years on the bench and one year in his current post as assignment judge. Read the NJBIZ article .

 

Want to explore the world of AI? Stay at the forefront of the latest products, legislation and services impacting the profession through the NJSBA AI Special Committee. To join, fill out the form and discover the NJSBA’s wide range of Special Committees for every practice area.

 
A 20/20 Look at 50/50 Custody: From the Bench, the Expert, and the Bar – Practical Tools for the “New” Custody Landscape
 
 
Book Rotation
 
 

Supreme Court, Appellate and Third Circuit Decision Summaries

 

Click on any decision below to get the full opinion – October 21, 2026.

 

NOT APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION

 

New Jersey Appellate Division

 

Landlord-Tenant – Residential Eviction

– The defendant Tamika Daley – the tenant – appealed from a judgment for possession in favor of the plaintiff 87 Newkirk Holdings, LLC – the landlord. The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal as moot.

 

Employment – Alleged Workplace Discrimination

– This matter arose out of an employment dispute concerning an arbitration clause in an employment agreement between the plaintiff Diana Quintero and the defendant Withumsmith+Brown P.C. Although both parties agreed that such a clause need not recite any and all statutory claims that are subject to arbitration, they disagreed regarding whether the clause at issue was ambiguous regarding arbitration of discrimination claims. The trial court concluded the clause was ambiguous and denied the defendants' motion to dismiss and compel arbitration. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

Family – Parenting Time

– In this post-judgment non-dissolution matter, the defendant Q.T. appealed from a Family Part order allowing the plaintiff T.W. overnight parenting time with the parties' minor child. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

– In this appeal, the defendant A.S. challenged a Family Part order that denied his application to reopen the proceedings concerning parenting time with the parties' son and denied his request to recalculate his child support obligation. The Appellate Division affirmed order denying the defendant's application to reopen the parenting-time proceedings.

 

Civil – Consumer Protection

– The defendants Brian Nogiewich, Integrity Builder, and I&B Enterprising appealed from an order denying their motion to vacate a default judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff Everlasting Strength Ministries, Inc. The judgement awarded $116,000 for church repairs that were largely never completed. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

Administrative – Disability Rights

– Th petitioner challenged a decision by the Division of Developmental Disabilities to keep her developmentally disabled adult son in a specific facility despite the mother's request for a transfer. An Administrative Law Judge granted summary disposition in favor of the division, which was adopted in the final agency decision with one minor modification. The Appellate Division affirmed the division’s decision.

 

Administrative – Public Pension

– The petitioner Robert J. Pinizzotto appealed from a final agency decision by the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) finding him ineligible for continued enrollment in PERS as of Jan.1, 2008. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

Criminal – Post-Conviction Relief

– The defendant Tareek Foster appealed from an order denying his petition for post-conviction relief without a hearing, contending he established a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant is serving a 10-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to aggravated assault and weapons possession. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

– The defendant Kevin T. Sadler appealed from the order denying his petition for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The defendant contended he demonstrated ineffective assistance of counsel warranting an evidentiary hearing based on trial counsel's failure to provide him with discovery, insufficient explanation of his jail and gap time credits, and lack of arguments at sentencing regarding the applicability of certain aggravating factors. The defendant is serving and eight-year prison term after pleading guilty to aggravated assault. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

Municipal – Sewer Connection

– The defendant Old Bridge Municipal Utilities Authority appealed from two orders granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs Midtown Water Company, Brunetti Organization, and John J. Brunetti, Jr., and denying its motion for partial summary judgment. The judgement declared that the plaintiffs were entitled to exemptions from water and sewer connection fees under longstanding agreements with the Old Bridge Municipal Utilities Authority. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

Estate – Contested Will

– The plaintiffs Toni Gallo aka Toni Luciano, Salvatore Luciano, and Patrick Carr appealed from a Chancery Division order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant Kristen DelGatto and dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice. The defendant cross-appealed from an order granting the plaintiffs' fee application requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiffs' counsel fees from the estate in accordance with Rule 4:42-9(a)(3). The plaintiffs filed suit after learning that their uncle, Thomas DelGatto, Jr., who had originally devised them a pro rata share of $5 million, changed his will and instead left the money to his wife Kristen and their two children. The plaintiffs claimed Thomas was unduly influenced by his wife, and his attorney changed his will without his knowledge. The plaintiffs also claimed they were entitled to attorneys' fees and costs from the estate given their good faith challenge to the will. The trial judge granted summary judgment to Kristen but ordered her to pay the plaintiffs' counsel fees and costs in her capacity as executor of the estate. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court.

 

Education – State Oversight Over Academic Degree Programs

– The appellant Rutgers University appealed from the final administrative decision and the final administrative determination of the Office of the Secretary of Higher Education (OSHE), holding that Rutgers must comply with N.J.A.C. 9A:1-2.10 to -2.14. These regulations, which the OSHE adopted in March 2022, pursuant to the authority granted under L. 2021, c. 27, require review of institutions' proposed new academic degree programs by the New Jersey Presidents' Council and authorize the OSHE to reject a proposed new academic degree program based upon the consideration of specified criteria—sufficient academic quality, evidence of labor market demand, duplication with comparable programs of study in the state, and whether the proposed new program will require significant additional state resources. Rutgers objected to application of the regulations on the grounds that it is statutorily and constitutionally exempt from state control over its academic programs as a matter of law. The Appellate Division agreed and reversed the administrative decision.

 

 
Understanding Emotional Distress Damages in Personal Injury Litigation: A Unified Cognitive Science Framework (I423426) - 11/2/26
 
 
 

New Jersey State Bar Association

One Constitution Square

New Brunswick, NJ 08901

732-249-5000